Fundamental Solutions of the Laplacian in Constant Curvature
differential geometryhyperbolic geometry
Explicit fundamental solutions in Euclidean, spherical, and hyperbolic space.
Here’s a quick computation of the fundamental solution to the laplacian Δf=δ in the constant curvature geometries.
This is well known but I always have to hunt a bit when I need them or end up re-deriving so figured I’d write it down.
Laplacian in Constant Curvature
If Xn is an n-dimensional constant curvature geometry, O∈X a point and r=dist(−,O) is the Riemannian distance from O, then the fundamental solution for the Laplacian based at O is
F(r)=ωn−11∫k(r)n−1dr
For ωn−1 the volume of the unit n−1 sphere, and k(r) is equal to sin(r), r or sinh(r) depending on if X is spherical, Euclidean or hyperbolic respectively.
And here’s some specific ones in low dimensions
The fundamental solutions to the laplacian in constant curvature are proportional to the following functions, where r is the geodesic distance from the chosen origin.
Two Dimensions:
E2: F(r)=2π1log(r)
S2: F(r)=2π1logtan2r
H2: F(r)=2π1logtanh2r
Three Dimensions:
E3: F(r)=4π−1r1
S3: F(r)=4π−1tanr1
H3: F(r)=4π−1tanhr1
The Trick
In Euclidean, hyperbolic and spherical geometry we work in polar coordinates, where the laplacian factors additively into two components, one differentiating along the radius and the other along n−1 spheres, the level sets of constant r.
Looking at these coordinate expressions we take advantage of a certain similarity - they are all the same up to a choice of sin(r), r or sinh(r). Thus, we can give a uniform expression abstracting these differences into a function k(r):
Δf=k(r)n−11∂r∂(k(r)n−1∂r∂f)+k(r)21ΔSn−1
This still looks a bit scary, but because everything is symmetric under rotations we might think to look for solutions sharing the same symmetry group. We’ll call such solutions radial as they depend only on r. In this case things simplify drastically
Radial Solutions
In any of the constant curvature geometries, if f is a radial solution to Δf=0 then f≡f(r) is proporitional to the following integral:
f(r)∝∫k(r)n−11dr
If f=f(r) then it is constant along n−1 spheres, and so its restriction to the unit sphere satisfies ΔSn−1f=0. But if this term is zero, then the entire expression for the Laplacian collapses to
Δf=k(r)n−11∂r∂(k(r)n−1∂r∂f)=0
Cancelling the prefactor of 1/kn−1 we see
∂r∂(k(r)n−1∂r∂f)=0
and as this derivative is identically zero, the quantity differentiated must be constant. That is, for some C∈R we have
k(r)n−1∂r∂f=C
And dividing through by kn−1 produces a differential equation for f(r), which upon integrating yields our formula
f(r)=∫k(r)n−1Cdr
Our goal is to promote a radial solution to a fundamental solution, which means finding the correct multiplying factor C. In practice, the easiest way for me to do this has been to find a function with suitably normalized derivative and then scale by the volume of the unit n−1 sphere.
Radial to Fundamental
If F~(r) any radial solution to ΔF~=0, then
F(r)=vol(SX(1))1F~′(1)F~(r)
is a fundamental solution to the laplacian, where SX(1) is the sphere of radius 1 in X centered at r=0.
Let X be one of the constant curvature geometries, and dV be its Riemannian volume form. If ΔF is to act like the delta distribution under integration, then for any region Ω⊂X we must have
∫ΩΔFdvol={01O∈ΩO∈Ω
Where O is the point δ is based at (r=0 in our coordinate system). On any region not containing O this is trivial as our radial solution F~ has constantly zero Laplacian everywhere it is defined. So, we only need to concern ourselves with regions containing O. For specificity, we can consider the unit ball Ω=BX(1)⊂X. Here we compute using the divergence theorem and set the result equal to 1 (since O∈Ω):
Where dS is the Riemannian n−1 volume form induced on the sphere SX(1) by the overall volume dvol.
Since F (and hence F′) are functions of r alone they are constant on the sphere SX(1), and restricting to the sphere is the same as plugging in r=1. This allows the one term above to be pulled out of the integral, giving
=∂r∂F(1)∫SX(1)dS=∂r∂F(1)vol(SX(1))
This quantity is supposed to be 1. If it is not, we can simply divide the current definition of F by it, and notice this constant multiple carries all the way through the calculation unscathed.
In fact, we can even do a little better than this since we know the functions k(r) that we are integrating. By the fundamental theorem of calculus
F′(r)=∂r∂F(r)=∂r∂∫k(r)n−11dr=k(r)n−11
Thus F′(1) is none other than 1/k(1)n−1, and we may as well incorporate this directly:
If X is a constant curvature geometry, then a fundamental solution F to the laplacian is given by
F(r)=vol(SX(1))k(1)n−1∫k(r)n−1dr
F is a scalar multiple of ∫k(r)n−1dr which we know to be harmonic on X∖O. And, as we saw before integrating the radial derivative over the unit sphere gives
But its even a little better than this! Because we are in the very special situation of constant curvature, we can actually compute the “volume” (ie surface area) of these spheres directly. For each n let ωn be the volume of the unit n-sphere in En. Then for all radii R
Thus uniform across all geometries we have vol(SX(1))=ωn−1k(1)n−1 and plugging this into our corollary we see that the factors of k(1)n−1always cancel out. This gives our main theorem:
Laplacian in Constant Curvature
If Xn is an n-dimensional constant curvature geometry, O∈X a point and r=dist(−,O) is the Riemannian distance from O, then the fundamental solution for the Laplacian based at O is
F(r)=ωn−11∫k(r)n−1dr
For ωn−1 the volume of the unit n−1 sphere, and k(r) is equal to sin(r), r or sinh(r) depending on if X is spherical, Euclidean or hyperbolic respectively.
Euclidean Space
Here are the explicit solutions for Euclidean spaces of low dimension, with k(r)=r.
2D
F(r)=2π1logr
First we compute the integral
∫k(r)dr=∫r1dr=log(r)
And then the normalizing factor: the “volume” of 1 dimensional sphere is just the cirumference of the unit circle, or 2π. Thus
F(r)=2π1log(r)
3D
F(r)=4π−1r1
We first compute the integral to find a radial solution:
∫k(r)2dr=∫r21dr=r−1
And then normalize by 4π, the surface area of the unit sphere
F(r)=4π−1r1
The same pattern continues in higher dimensions,
n-Dimensions
Spherical Space
Here are the explicit solutions for spherical spaces of low dimension, with k(r)=sin(r).
2D
F(r)=2π1logtan2r
To find a radial solution we must compute
∫sinrdr=∫sin(r)1dr=∫csc(r)dr
This is one of those annoying integrals you learn in calculus and then forget, because deriving it needs a trick. Anyway,
∫csc(r)dr=ln∣csc(r)−cot(r)∣
There are many trig identites one could use to “simplify” here: for example this is equal to −ln∣cscr+cotr∣ (which I didn’t know until wolfram alpha told me so). For us, its nicest to simplify as
cscr−cotr=sinr1−sinrcosr=sinr1−cosr=tan2r
where the last equality is the tangent half angle formula.
We are in 2 dimensions so the normalizing factor is the unit 1-sphere’s volume or 2π:
F(r)=2π1logtan2r
3D
F(r)=4π1tan(r)1
Computing a radial solution to start, we recognize an easier integral from calculus involving the cotangent
∫k(r)2dr=∫sin2(r)1dr=∫csc2(r)dr=−cot(r)=tan(r)−1
For the normalizing constant in dimension 3 we look to the unit 2-sphere, whose area is 4π.
F(r)=4π−1tanr1
Unlike in Euclidean space the calculations don’t stabilize in difficulty beyond n=3, and instead get more challenging as powers of k grow in the integrand.
4D
F(r)=4π2−1(sin2rcosr−logtan2r)
The radial solution is
∫k(r)3dr=∫sin3(r)1dr=∫csc3(r)dr
This is an integral you might see in calculus if you’re looking for really tricky examples at the end of the chapter (perhaps the more commonly seen case is its sibling sec3(x)):
∫csc3(r)dr=2−cscrcotr+log∣cscr−cotr∣
We can simplify this a bit by (i) factoring out the constant −1/2, (ii) expanding cosecant and cotangent in terms of sines and cosines, and treating the last term with the half-angle identity, as we previously did.
=2−1(sin2rcosr−logtan2r)
Here the normalizing constant is the surface area of the unit 3-sphere. We can find this if we know the volume of 4−balls grows as 21π2R4 by differentiation, 2π2R3, so the unit sphere has volume 2π2. Dividing by this gives the answer
4π2−1(sin2rcosr−logtan2r)
In higher dimensions, we continue having to confront the integral of 1/sinN(r) for various N. Such integrals are doable (though not fun), with the tricks basically sorting by even and odd dimensions.
Hyperbolic Space
Here are the explicit solutions for hyperbolic spaces of low dimension, with k(r)=sinh(r).
2D
F(r)=2π1logtan2r
Very analogous to the spherical case, we have the integral
∫k(r)dr=∫sinhr1dr=∫cschrdr
This integral can be accomplished by substitution and partial fractions unpacking the definition of sinh in terms of the exponential…or just remembered in analogy with the spherical trigonometric case:
=log∣cschr−cothr∣
Writing in terms of sinh and cosh lets us recognize the hyperbolic tangent half angle identity:
cothr−csch=sinhrcoshr−1=tanh2r
Where we have switched the order of the terms from the previous lines, as they occur inside an absolute value so it does not affect anything. Finally dividing by the normalizing constant of 2D, or 2π yields the answer
F(r)=2π1logtan2r
3D
F(r)=4π−1tanhr1
The radial solution is calculable as
∫k(r)2dr=∫sinh2r1dr=∫csch2rdr=−cothr=tanhr−1
The normalizing constant in three dimensions is 4π, so
F(r)=4π−1tanhr1