Fundamental Solutions of the Laplacian with Spherical Symmetry
The fundamental solution is the integral of reciprocal surface area.
This not redoes the calculation of fundamental solutions to the laplacian in constant curvature geometries, in a more abstract and general framework. The key to those calculations was spherical symmetry, and here we work with general Riemannian manifolds that have spherical symmetry about some point , finding the fundamental solution for all of them.
Let be a spherically symmetric manifold with radial function , and the surface area of its level sets. Then the following function is a fundamental solution for the Laplacian on ,
Proving this theorem requires two calculations that were done in recent notes, reviewed below.
- The Laplacian Chain Rule: if and then .
- Laplacians and Isometries: if and then .
Spherical Symmetry
First we need a precise definition of spherical symmetry to work with. If is a Riemannian manifold, we write for the group of all isometries . If is a subset, we write for the subgroup of isometries sending .
Spherical Symmetry
A Riemannian manifold is spherically symmetric if there is a point where contains a copy of .
This definition picks out a particular point in the manifold as special, so its natural to look at the distance function from :
Radial Function
If is spherically symmetric about , the radial function for measures the geodesic distance from :
We call a function radial if it factors through . This radial function is not smooth at (the graph nearby looks like a “cone”), and in general it may not be smooth at other points (such as the antipodal point to if is the -sphere). For the rest of this note we will work with spaces where is assumed smooth: so we delete points like the antipode if needed.
Finally a small technical point worth noting: what we’ve introduced there are two natural families of hypersurfaces one could think about defining geometrically in a spherically symmetric manifold: the group orbits of , and the level sets of . But these are the same
The group orbits of coincide with the level sets of .
If two points lie in the same group orbit, for some isometry . Because this isometry fixes we have So lie in the same level set of , and orbits are subsets of level sets.
To get the reverse inclusion, let lie at the same distance from , and let be the geodesics starting from ending at each after time . Then the initial tangent vectors are unit vectors in , and the assumed isometries of descend by differentiation to an action on by isometries. Since ‘s action on the unit sphere in is transitive, there is some with . But as isometires preserve geodesics and geodesics are determined by their initial conditions, this implies that and so Thus lie in the same group orbit.
Finding Fundamental Solutions
Here we carry out the explicit computations to find a fundamental solution to . The radial function will play an important role so we start with a quick lemma computing its Laplacian.
Let be a spherically symmetric manifold with radial function , and the surface area of its level sets. Then
We proceed to calculate using , building up one operation at a time. The first to understand is . By definition this is the form such that For the Riemannian volume form on . The metric on 1-forms is induced from vectors via the musical isomorphism so and by general theorems of Riemannian geometry, since is a distance function is a unit vector field. Thus
Again by general theorems of Riemannian geometry, is orthogonal to the geodesic spheres centered at , so we can orthogonally decompose the volume form of into an component, and the volume form of the level set . Thus by definition we must have . Because each of these level sets is a round sphere, we can write their volume forms uniformly in terms of the unit volume form of the -sphere, scaled by the area of the geodesic sphere in question. Putting this together, Now we differentiate with the product rule Since is a closed form on the sphere, and the first term simplifies as so Because this result is a top-dimensional form it must be some multiple of the volume form on , and it will make our next step easier if we rewrite it in that form. Recall we know an orthogonal decomposition of the volume form , and . Computing (and dropping all composition with from the notation for brevity) Substituting this in, Now we apply the final hodge star, completing the proof
Now we come to our main theorem:
Let be a spherically symmetric manifold with radial function , and the surface area of its level sets. Then the following function is a fundamental solution for the Laplacian on ,
We prove this in two steps. First we see that really is harmonic on , and then we show (as a distribution) it has the correct behavior on neighborhoods of .
Let be the radial distance function and defined by Then the composition is harmonic on .
If is any function such that is harmonic, the chain rule for the Laplacian implies Since is a Riemannian distance and we calculated above to be the radial function for the surface area of geodesic spheres about . Thus, for every we have
This is satisfied for all if and only if and obey the prescribed 1-dimensional ODE for all . Clearing denominators reveals the left hand side to be a product rule:
Thus is constant. This provides a differential equation for : The case yields the function we are after by quadrature Where is arbitrary, setting a constant of integration.
In situations like this we will often allow ourselves the following abuse of notation: if the constant of integration is arbitrary then we might like to write the integral as indefinite with as the dummy variable of integration. And, when the end goal is to compose with another function like , we may switch the dummy variable to this and write
Next we see that integration of on domains behaves like the distribution. Note - all integrals over regions containing should be considered distributionally.
Let be a domain for integration. Then
If , then is well defined and smooth on all of , and on . Thus So we need only be concerned with domains where . First we see the value of the integral is independent of the particular domain. If are two domains containing in their interior, its possible to find a small geodesic ball about contained in both of them. Then we may write which gives a decomposition of the corresponding integrals But the first integral in this sum is over a domain not containing , so is zero by the previous argument. Thus both the integral over and equal the integral over , and so are equal to one another.
Now let’s evaluate such an integral. Since the value is independent of domain, we can without loss of generality fix some geodesic ball about , and note that by the definition of the Hodge dual and unpacking allows some cancellation as on top-dimensional forms Now that our form begins with exterior differentiation we can apply (a distributional version of) Stokes’ theorem: Since is a geodesic ball centered at , its boundary is a sphere: To continue, we must bring in our definition of .
Differentiating,
We know from the calculation of how to work with : at any fixed , this is just the volume form of the sphere of that radius about , and for the unit volume (integrating to on any level set )
Putting this all together, we have successfully computed the integral:
Constant Curvature Geometries
With the general theorem in hand we now specialize the result to the familiar cases of constant curvature. We do not need to choose any coordinates; the only geometric quantity needed from each geometry is the “area” of the embedded spheres of radius :
The surface area of spheres of radius in the -dimensional spaces of constant curvature are Where is the size of the unit sphere of curvature 1:
This immediately gives integral forms of the fundamental solutions in each constant curvature geometry:
The fundamental solutions to in constant curvature are
For Euclidean geometry, all of these integrals are easily computable by hand: results in a logarithm and the rest directly follow from the ‘power rule’
For hyperbolic and spherical geometry, we can compute dimension by hand
Whereas getting explicit formulae for higher dimensions relies on the reduction formulae for integration and :
The integrals of secant and its hyperbolic analog satisfy the following recurrences:
The General Case:
What if we are given a spherically symmetric metric in cartesian coordinates, where geometric quantities like the geodesic distance are not immediately apparent? Here’s we record the necessary computations. For brevity we will write to be the ‘coordinate length’. Consider the metric Where is some smooth function. Some computation yields the following characterization:
If for , then the fundamental solution to the Laplacian on is
This metric has spherical symmetry given by the usual action of on and so symmetry arguments1 imply that radial lines are geodesics, and so we can compute the radial function on as a function of by integrating along the geodesic to get a function :
Then the radial function is given by . We are going to need to be careful with bounds, so write where is an arbitrary real number (fixing the constant of integration). Then the fundamental solution to the Laplacian is :
We can rewrite this integral using the substitution and simplify using from differentiating the previous integral:
where is the surface area of the sphere with coordinate length . We can directly calculate this from the metric: at every vector is stretched by the uniform factor , so the directions spanning the unit sphere are stretched by this same factor. Thus the overall area is scaled by relative to the area that same sphere would have in the standard Euclidean metric. Since this would be , we seee
Substituting this in,
Now we can return to our standard abuse of notation: with the upper bound directly just with arbitrary lower bound, we use as the dummy variable in our indefinite integral and interpret the resulting function of as a function of a real variable composed with the coordinate length function :
Appendix: Proving Existence without Computing
Here’s an argument in the same spirit as the explicit one above, that proves the existence of a radial harmonic function without actually constructing it (essentially, it just avoids computing ). Totally unnecessary for our purposes here but I want to record it in case its of future use.
There exists a radial harmonic function on .
A radial harmonic function is some which satisfies and factors for some . The chain rule for the Laplacian gives an equation for Since is a Riemannian distance and this simplifies giving an equation that must hold for all : If is a radial function (so for some ) then this becomes , which only holds on if for all in the range of we have This is an ordinary differential equation on the real line which is easily solved via integrating factors, and any such solution provides a harmonic radial function. Thus it suffices to prove that is radial: equivalently that is constant on the level sets of .
Let lie on the same level set . Because -level sets = orbits, there is an isometry with . Thus
Because is an isometry it pulls out of the Laplacian: . And as is the Riemannian distance from ,
Putting these together, , and so
So is constant on the level sets of : its radial, as required.
Footnotes
-
If a geodesic starts with initial tangent in the fixed plane of a reflection isometry, then it must remain in that fixed plane for all time. Radial lines are the intersection of independent reflections, so geodesics starting out radially are confined to them. ↩