Moduli of Right-Angled Hyperbolic Pentagons

A surprise appearance of the golden ratio in hyperbolic geometry.

There are no right angled quadrilaterals in the hyperbolic plane. The angles of a hyperbolic nn-gon must total less than (n2)π(n-2)\pi — the deficit is exactly its area — and four right angles come to 2π2\pi on the nose. Five right angles come to 5π2\frac{5\pi}{2}, comfortably under 3π3\pi, leaving an area of π2\frac{\pi}{2} to spare. So the pentagon is the first polygon that can be right angled at every corner.

Existence of at least one is easy: we can construct a regular hyperbolic pentagon (with all sides the same) by constructing an appropriate triangle, and repeating.

But just like the square isn’t the only right angled quadrilateral in Euclidean geometry, neither is this the only right angled pentagon in the hyperbolic plane. The goal of this note is to completely classify right angled hyperbolic pentagons. In particular, we prove

TheoremModuli of Right Angled Pentagons

If PP is a right angled pentagon and a,ba,b are the lengths of a pair of adjacent sides, then sinhasinhb>1\sinh a\,\sinh b>1. Further for every positive a,ba,b satisfying this condition there is a unique such pentagon.

Thus the moduli space of right angled pentagons is parameterized by

P{a,b>0  sinhasinhb>1}\mathcal{P}\cong\bigl\{\,a,b>0\ \big|\ \sinh a\,\sinh b>1\,\bigr\}

though it is worth being precise about what a point of this region is. It is not quite a pentagon: it is a pentagon together with a choice of which adjacent pair is (a,b)(a,b). There are five corners to pick, and two ways to order the pair at each, so ten choices in all. What the region parameterizes is the marked moduli space.

Those ten relabelings act on the region itself. Moving the marking to the next corner sends (a,b)(a,b) to (b,c)(b,c) — a map of P\mathcal{P} to itself of order five — and reading a corner the other way sends (a,b)(a,b) to (b,a)(b,a). The two together generate the dihedral group D5D_5, and the moduli space of pentagons up to isometry (reflections allowed) is the quotient

MP/D5\mathcal{M}\cong\mathcal{P}/D_5

A pentagon with no symmetry has ten distinct markings, and so ten points of P\mathcal{P} lying above it. Symmetric ones have fewer: a mirror-symmetric pentagon has five, and exactly one point of the region is fixed by the whole group. Being fixed forces all five sides equal, so that point is the regular pentagon — and there is precisely one of it.

The Proof

The main idea is simple to state. Draw sides of length a,ba,b perpendicular to each other, then draw common perpendiculars at the endpoints. These either intersect, or they don’t. If they do, no pentagon. If they do not, then there’s a unique shortest common perpendicular. This fifth side forms a right angled pentagon with the others.

To work out the details, we need to find a way to tell when exactly the two sides we extend orthogonally from the segments of length a,ba,b remain disjoint. And to be really quantitative, when they are ultraparallel we should like to know the length of their common perpendicular. The idea is to bring in the trigonometry of hyperbolic triangles, by drawing the geodesic through the endpoints of segments aa and bb. This subdivides each of the right angles there into pairs, α,αˉ\alpha,\bar{\alpha} opposite aa and β,βˉ\beta,\bar{\beta} opposite bb. Call the length of this segment XX.

The Law of Cosines

The chord cuts the picture into two pieces. One of them is a right triangle, so we have access to many trigonometric relations between a,b,αˉ,βˉa,b,\bar{\alpha},\bar{\beta} and XX. The other piece is still a mystery: maybe it’s a triangle (finite or ideal) or maybe it’s infinite in area (if the geodesics are ultraparallel). There’s a nice trick here - in the triangle case, one is naturally tempted to employ the law of cosines: but in fact the hyperbolic law of cosines[1^] works in both cases. First, for the triangle - we can compute the angle χ\chi opposite XX via

[1^]: There are actually two hyperbolic laws of cosines. The other one is a direct analog of the Euclidean case; and the one we utilize here has no analog in Euclidean geometry as it allows one to calculate a side length in terms of only information about angles!

cosχ=cosαcosβ+sinαsinβcoshX\cos\chi = -\cos\alpha\,\cos\beta+\sin\alpha\,\sin\beta\,\cosh X

But in the ultraparallel case, the length dd of the common perpendicular satisfies the same relation:

coshd=cosαcosβ+sinαsinβcoshX\cosh d = -\cos\alpha\,\cos\beta+\sin\alpha\,\sin\beta\,\cosh X

Thus, given any leg of length XX with angles α,β\alpha,\beta at the endpoints we can compute the common right hand side of this formula, and fully understand the situation:

[2^]: When it equals precisely 1, the triangle has an ideal vertex opposite XX so the angle is zero. The two sides are then asymptotic — they neither meet nor admit a common perpendicular, and it is exactly the knife edge between the two cases.

Relating to the Triangle

We want an expression in terms of aa and bb, but right now the law of cosines is in terms of αˉ,βˉ\bar{\alpha},\bar{\beta} and XX. First, as α+αˉ=π/2\alpha+\bar{\alpha}=\pi/2 and β+βˉ=π/2\beta+\bar{\beta}=\pi/2 the trigonometric functions of either of these determine the other. This observation, together with the trigonometry of right triangles implies

cosα=sinαˉ=sinhasinhX,cosβ=sinβˉ=sinhbsinhX,sinα=cosαˉ=tanhbtanhX,sinβ=cosβˉ=tanhatanhX.\begin{aligned} \cos\alpha &= \sin\bar\alpha = \frac{\sinh a}{\sinh X}, &\qquad \cos\beta &= \sin\bar\beta = \frac{\sinh b}{\sinh X},\\[8pt] \sin\alpha &= \cos\bar\alpha = \frac{\tanh b}{\tanh X}, &\qquad \sin\beta &= \cos\bar\beta = \frac{\tanh a}{\tanh X}. \end{aligned}

And, of course, the pythagorean identity for the sides:

coshX=coshacoshb\cosh X = \cosh a\,\cosh b

The Calculation

Starting with the mystery quantity determined by the law of cosines, we substitute terms computed from the triangle above. Watch what happens to XX: it enters both terms and then leaves again, and the answer depends only on aa and bb.

?=cosαcosβ+sinαsinβcoshX=sinhasinhXsinhbsinhX+tanhbtanhXtanhatanhXcoshX\begin{aligned} ?&=-\cos\alpha\,\cos\beta+\sin\alpha\,\sin\beta\,\cosh X\\[6pt] &=-\frac{\sinh a}{\sinh X}\cdot\frac{\sinh b}{\sinh X} +\frac{\tanh b}{\tanh X}\cdot\frac{\tanh a}{\tanh X}\cosh X \end{aligned}

Expanding the definitions of tanha\tanh a, tanhb\tanh b in the second term and using the pythagorean identity for coshX\cosh X:

tanhatanhXtanhbtanhXcoshX=1tanh2X(sinhacoshasinhbcoshb)coshX=1tanh2X(sinhacoshasinhbcoshb)coshacoshb=sinhasinhbtanh2X\begin{aligned} \frac{\tanh a}{\tanh X}\cdot\frac{\tanh b}{\tanh X}\cosh X &=\frac{1}{\tanh^2 X}\left(\frac{\sinh a}{\cosh a}\cdot\frac{\sinh b}{\cosh b}\right)\cosh X\\[6pt] &=\frac{1}{\tanh^2 X}\left(\frac{\sinh a}{\cosh a}\cdot\frac{\sinh b}{\cosh b}\right)\cosh a\,\cosh b\\[6pt] &=\frac{\sinh a\,\sinh b}{\tanh^2 X} \end{aligned}

Plugging this back in:

?=sinhasinhbsinh2X+sinhasinhbtanh2X=sinhasinhb(1tanh2X1sinh2X)=sinhasinhb(coth2Xcsch2X)=sinhasinhb\begin{aligned} ?&=-\frac{\sinh a\,\sinh b}{\sinh^2 X}+\frac{\sinh a\,\sinh b}{\tanh^2 X}\\[6pt] &=\sinh a\,\sinh b\left(\frac{1}{\tanh^2 X}-\frac{1}{\sinh^2 X}\right)\\[6pt] &=\sinh a\,\sinh b\left(\coth^2 X-\operatorname{csch}^2 X\right)\\[6pt] &=\sinh a\,\sinh b \end{aligned}

where the final line uses coth2Xcsch2X=1\coth^2 X-\operatorname{csch}^2 X=1, the cosecant–cotangent identity. After all that cancellation we see that our mystery quantity is just sinhasinhb\sinh a\,\sinh b, and when this quantity is 1\leq 1 the edges intersect (perhaps ideally) and there is no possible hyperbolic pentagon constructible from the configuration. But when sinhasinhb>1\sinh a\,\sinh b>1, the sides are ultraparallel and there is a unique geodesic intersecting each orthogonally. That is, there is a unique hyperbolic pentagon with all right angles, proving our theorem.

Description of All Sides

With a precise characterization of all right angled pentagons in hand, we turn to the quantitative problem of determining their side lengths. Label the sides a,b,,ea,b,\ldots, e clockwise around the pentagon as below:

First, the law of cosines determines dd in terms aa and bb. This identity turns out to be incredibly useful well beyond the study of pentagons, so we box it off:

TheoremTrigonometry of Right Angled Pentagons

If a,ba,b are adjacent sides of a right angled hyperbolic pentagon and dd is the side opposite them,

coshd=sinhasinhb\cosh d = \sinh a\,\sinh b

Applying this rule to other pairs of sides, we see that cosha=sinhcsinhd\cosh a = \sinh c\,\sinh d, and as dd and aa are known, this gives cc. Likewise, sinhbsinhc=coshe\sinh b\,\sinh c = \cosh e and since we already know bb and cc this fixes ee. Unpacking these give explicit descriptions in terms of a,ba,b:

Theorem

If a,ba,b are adjacent sides of a right angled hyperbolic pentagon, the remaining sides c,d,ec,d,e satisfy

coshd=sinhasinhbsinhc=coshasinhd=coshacosh2d1=coshasinh2asinh2b1coshe=sinhbsinhc=coshasinhbsinh2asinh2b1\begin{aligned} \cosh d &= \sinh a\,\sinh b\\[8pt] \sinh c &= \frac{\cosh a}{\sinh d} = \frac{\cosh a}{\sqrt{\cosh^2 d-1}} = \frac{\cosh a}{\sqrt{\sinh^2 a\,\sinh^2 b-1}}\\[8pt] \cosh e &= \sinh b\,\sinh c = \frac{\cosh a\,\sinh b}{\sqrt{\sinh^2 a\,\sinh^2 b-1}} \end{aligned}

Appendix: The Regular Pentagon

One point of P\mathcal{P} is fixed by the whole D5D_5 action, and it is worth measuring: the regular pentagon, where all five sides agree. Call this common side length ee. Then by the trigonometry of pentagons we see

sinhesinhe=coshe\sinh e\,\sinh e = \cosh e

And as sinh2e=cosh2e1\sinh^2 e =\cosh^2 e-1, the quantity u=cosheu=\cosh e satisfies the quadratic polynomial u21=uu^2-1=u, or

u2=u+1u^2=u+1

The defining equation for the golden ratio, which has φ=1+52\varphi=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2} as its unique positive root.

Theorem

The regular right angled pentagon has edge length ee satisfying

coshe=φ=1+52\cosh e = \varphi = \frac{1+\sqrt5}{2}

or e1.0612e\approx 1.0612\ldots

← All notes